Tactical Athletic Development in Strength and Conditioning
Strength and Conditioning is highly centered around building strength, size, power, and speed. All of those qualities are certainly important for athletic performance. It is quite obvious that there is a threshold of athletic qualities to compete at certain levels. Turn on any Division 1 college football game and you will realize the level of athleticism is anything but average. So what becomes the separating factor in team sports?
This is a complicated answer. Yes, it could be physiological -- some players even at the elite level may still be dominant purely off athletic prowess. But I think at times outcomes on the field may not be shaped by pure physiology, but rather the ability to process and make decisions quickly. The question that should arise is: how do I train this quality of tactical decision making?
The O.O.D.A Loop Principle
The O.O.D.A Loop is a term developed by the United States military to make decisions in combat situations. The acronym stands for Observe, Orient, Decide, and Act.
Put yourself in an athletic scenario. A quarterback in American football walks to the line -- he looks left and right observing the defense. The quarterback then orients his position looking for leverage against the defense. Once the ball is snapped, the quarterback must use all of the digested information, process it quickly, and turn a decision into an action -- in this case, quickly releasing the ball because of a blitzer he recognized pre-snap.
This is what athletes are challenged with constantly throughout the course of a game. Therefore, it is essential that coaches find ways to create training scenarios that challenge the decision making process of athletes in a fast, fluid, and open environment.
Specificity and Bridging the Gap
As strength and conditioning coaches, we understand the most specific training an athlete can get is actually playing their sport. We also understand that playing the sport year-round is not beneficial. Our job requires us to physically prepare the athlete -- and part of that preparation is getting them ready for high speed tactical decision making.
This is where coaches look for drills, tasks, or scenarios to challenge athletes' ability to think quickly, strategize, and act. It is my belief that the best way to do this is through an open agility approach. We cannot micro-manage every movement all of the time. Eventually, coaches need to let athletes be athletes.
High speed decision making is the name of the game.
Semi-Open Agility
I believe in progressions and regressions of drills. Starting with semi-open drills is a great place to begin. By semi-open, the athlete may be relatively constrained to certain movements or space -- but there is still a reactionary component. Below is a breakdown of semi-open agility drills to use in an athlete's early off-season when agility is being reintroduced to the training diet.
Level 1
1 vs. 1 Lateral Shuffle Mirror
1 vs. 1 Lateral Shuffle Mirror VideoPlace two cones 5-7 yards away from each other. One athlete dictates the direction -- the other acts as the mirror. The goal is for the athlete in control to obtain separation from the athlete mirroring.
1 vs. 1 Cross-Over Mirror
1 vs. 1 Cross-Over Mirror VideoPlace two cones 10-15 yards away from each other. One athlete dictates the direction -- the other acts as the mirror. Using only a cross-over movement, the dictator's goal is to obtain separation from the mirror.
1 vs. 1 Lateral to Linear Mirror
1 vs. 1 Lateral to Linear Mirror VideoPlace two cones 20 yards away from each other. One athlete dictates while the other mirrors. The dictating athlete can alternate at random between lateral movement (cross-over or shuffle) or linear movement (forwards or backwards). On a second "go" call, the dictating athlete sprints to one of the two cones.
1 vs. 1 Linear Deceleration
1 vs. 1 Linear Deceleration Mirror VideoPlace a cone 15-20 yards from the starting line. One athlete dictates the deceleration, while the other has to react, stop, and reaccelerate to match. The drill continues until the athletes cover the full distance.
1 vs. 1 Linear Mirror
1 vs. 1 Linear Mirror VideoOne athlete moves forward dictating the movement of the athlete moving backwards. The backwards athlete's goal is to stay square while maintaining a 2-3 yard distance. The drill space should be 5-7 yards wide and 15-20 yards long.
1 vs. 1 Trail to 90 Cut Mirror
1 vs. 1 Trail to 90 Cut Mirror VideoSet up four cones in a T formation -- two cones 10 yards apart with two additional cones 5 yards out to each side. One athlete starts in front, the other trails behind. The front athlete makes a decision to go left or right, and the trailing athlete must stick behind.
Level 2
2-3 Gate Reaction
2-3 Gate Reaction VideoSet up two or three gates depending on athlete count. If three gates are set up, two athletes will each pick a gate to run to. The reacting athlete must identify and run through the open gate.
2 Gate Reaction with U-Turn
2 Gate Reaction with U-Turn VideoSet up two gates. One athlete picks a gate -- the other must react and run through the open one. The reacting athlete continues to sprint to a cone 5-8 yards beyond the gates, turns around, and reacts to the open gate again.
2-3 Man Chaos
2-3 Man Chaos VideoTwo to three athletes stand in a line. A lone athlete starts 5-8 yards away and accelerates to a cone 3-4 yards ahead. When he reaches the cone, one of the lined athletes sprints out of the line. The lone athlete matches direction and they race to a cone left or right, then sprint back through the middle. First through the middle wins.
2 vs. 1 Corral
2 vs. 1 Corral VideoCreate a rectangle 15 yards wide and 20 yards long. The lone athlete starts in the middle while two athletes start in opposite corners. The pair works to corral the single athlete into a corner -- the lone athlete cannot contact either to escape. Once trapped, the team of two wins. Add a time restriction to increase intensity.
These drills are great transitionary steps to pure open agility and will prepare the athlete for high speed unplanned deceleration and reacceleration. The human component is critical due to the processing speed required. Change of Direction cone drills have real value -- but at a certain point in an athlete's training, high speed reactions and live choices are a must.
Open Agility
Open ended agility is unrestrictive, chaotic, and presented in the form of evade and score. Team sports are all about the ability to create space, close space, and make the correct decision quickly. Exposing athletes to this environment trains their processing and reacting abilities while also giving them the opportunity to explore movement.
Athletes will begin to explore different ways to evade defenders, strategize with teammates, and track down opponents. Although not sport-specific in the traditional sense, this is the closest strength coaches can get to an athlete's sport -- due to the chaotic environment, high speed acceleration and deceleration, strategizing, and the fundamental game of evade and score. Open agility is the final link in the chain between a training environment and actual sport.
Open Agility Examples
3 Gate Option Score
3 Gate Option Score VideoSet up three gates (two cones about 3 yards apart each). Space the gates as far as desired. Two athletes on offense, two on defense. Offense scores by running through a gate without being tagged. Defense must tag before the offensive athlete reaches a gate.
1 vs. 1 Two Gate Score
1 vs. 1 Two Gate Score VideoSet up two gates. One athlete on offense, one on defense. The offensive athlete scores by running through a gate without being tagged. Simple format -- maximum reactivity required from both athletes.
1 vs. 1 Curved Run into 3 Gate Score
1 vs. 1 Curved Run into 3 Gate Score VideoSet up three gates spaced as desired. Athletes start with a curved sprint to enter the drill. This adds a momentum element and forces athletes to read the defense while still accelerating into the space.
3 Gate Option Score with Barriers
3 Gate Option Score with Barriers VideoSame as the three-gate option score with physical barriers added to further complicate the environment. Barriers force athletes to navigate obstacles while simultaneously processing defensive positioning -- the closest training environment to live sport.
Specific Conditioning Demands
A highly underrated aspect of these drills is the specific conditioning environment they create. Because the drills involve human reaction, acceleration and deceleration, and high speed decision making, the conditions are closely suited to in-game demands -- not only physiologically but also cognitively. It becomes significantly harder to react and process information when fatigued.
Adding time constraints to work-to-rest ratios within drills is a great way to develop sport-specific conditioning. In American football, for example, the average play is 5.5 seconds and rest can span from several seconds up to 25 seconds (Hoffman, 2015). At the end of the day, team sport athletes need to be conditioned for high speed deceleration, change of direction, high speed sprinting, and repeat sprint ability -- and open and semi-open agility training covers all of these bases, with the added benefit of simultaneously training decision making and processing.
Key Takeaways
- Team sport performance is shaped as much by decision making speed as by physical ability.
- The O.O.D.A Loop -- Observe, Orient, Decide, Act -- is a framework coaches can actively train.
- Semi-open agility drills bridge the gap between closed cone drills and live sport environments.
- Open agility trains processing, reacting, movement exploration, and sport-specific conditioning simultaneously.
- Work-to-rest ratios within agility drills can be manipulated to build specific anaerobic conditioning.
Final Thoughts
Hopefully after reading this you will realize the importance this modality of training has on an athlete's preparation. Be creative -- put athletes in all sorts of scenarios and positions that will challenge them. Remember the ultimate goal is bridging that final gap between the field and the training environment, as well as meeting the specific physiological demands the athlete will face on game day.
References
Hoffman, J. (2015, April). Physiological Demands of American Football. Gatorade Sports Science Institute. https://www.gssiweb.org/sports-science-exchange/article/sse-143-physiological-demands-of-american-football